Kỹ thuật trám bít single-cone

The Single-Cone Obturation Technique in Modern Endodontics: A Comprehensive Analysis from Principles to Clinical Outcomes

The Imperative of the Three-Dimensional Seal: Principles of Root Canal Obturation

The successful long-term retention of a tooth following endodontic therapy is contingent upon a series of meticulously executed procedures, culminating in the obturation of the root canal system. This final phase, while often viewed as the definitive filling, is fundamentally a preventative measure designed to maintain the state of disinfection achieved during chemo-mechanical preparation. Understanding the biological rationale, historical evolution, and modern ideals of obturation is essential to contextualizing the role and efficacy of any specific technique, including single-cone obturation.

The Biological Rationale for Obturation: Preventing Reinfection and Entombing Residual Pathogens

Endodontic treatment is predicated on the management of microbial disease.1 The primary etiology of pulpal and periapical pathosis is the invasion of microorganisms and their byproducts into the root canal system.1 Consequently, the therapeutic process involves the comprehensive debridement and disinfection of this intricate anatomical space.2 However, due to the complex morphology of the root canal system—replete with isthmuses, lateral canals, and apical deltas—complete sterilization is considered a biological and clinical impossibility.3 It is this reality that establishes the imperative for obturation. Derived from the Latin obturare, meaning to block or close, obturation is the three-dimensional filling and sealing of the cleaned and shaped root canal system.1 Its primary objective is to create an impermeable, fluid-tight, and bacteria-tight seal from the coronal orifice to the apical terminus.2 This hermetic seal serves two critical biological functions. First, it prevents coronal microleakage, blocking the ingress of oral fluids, bacteria, and their nutrient substrates from re-colonizing the canal space.1 Second, it isolates the periapical tissues from the canal environment, preventing the percolation of periapical exudate, which could serve as a nutrient source for any remaining microbes.1 The second core function of obturation is the entombment of residual microorganisms that have survived the chemo-mechanical debridement phase.1 By physically isolating these microbes and cutting off their nutritional supply from both coronal and apical sources, a successful obturation renders them quiescent and pathogenically insignificant.1 This principle underscores a critical hierarchy in endodontic therapy: the success of obturation is wholly dependent on the quality of the preceding disinfection. An obturation technique, no matter how sophisticated, cannot compensate for inadequate cleaning and shaping.2 The reduction of the microbial load is the primary determinant of success, and the role of obturation is to preserve this disinfected state indefinitely. This relationship establishes that the obturation and the final coronal restoration, which provides the coronal seal, are equally vital to preventing treatment failure.2

Historical Perspectives: From Fauchard's Lead Fillings to the Gutta-Percha Era

The quest to seal the root canal is nearly as old as modern dentistry itself. The earliest documented attempt at root canal filling was described in 1728 by Pierre Fauchard, who utilized hammered lead foils to fill prepared canals.2 The 19th century saw a variety of materials being explored. In 1847, Hill introduced "Hill Stopping," a mixture of bleached gutta-percha, calcium carbonate, and quartz.5 However, the pivotal moment in the history of obturation materials arrived in 1867, when Bowman first reported the use of gutta-percha (GP) as a dedicated root canal filling material.2 Gutta-percha, a natural thermoplastic polymer, offered properties of biocompatibility, plasticity, and dimensional stability that were far superior to its predecessors. The introduction of gutta-percha spurred the development of techniques to place it effectively. Early methods were rudimentary, such as Perry's 1883 technique of packing a gold wire wrapped in gutta-percha into the canal.5 The evolution of obturation philosophy took a significant step forward in 1914 when Callahan introduced the lateral condensation technique.11 This method involved placing a master GP cone and then using a "spreader" instrument to laterally compact it against the canal walls, creating space for smaller, accessory cones. This approach established a long-standing paradigm in endodontics: to maximize the volume of the solid core material (gutta-percha) and minimize the volume of the root canal sealer. The sealer was viewed as a necessary but weak component, primarily serving to fill minor gaps and lubricate cone placement, with concerns about its solubility and potential for shrinkage over time. For decades, cold lateral condensation (CLC) was considered the "gold standard" against which all other techniques were measured.12

Defining the Ideal Obturation: Grossman's Criteria Revisited in a Modern Context

The principles guiding the selection of obturation materials were codified by Louis Grossman, whose criteria for an ideal root canal filling remain highly relevant. These criteria can be divided between the core material and the sealer. An ideal core material, such as gutta-percha, should be easily manipulated, dimensionally stable, non-irritating to periapical tissues, radiopaque for radiographic assessment, antimicrobial (or at least not support bacterial growth), and biocompatible.10 An ideal sealer must possess even more demanding properties. It should establish a fluid-tight seal, be radiopaque, antimicrobial, non-shrinking upon setting, biocompatible, and insoluble in tissue fluids. Critically, for the purposes of potential retreatment, it should also be soluble in a common solvent.8 In the contemporary context, the concept of an ideal obturation has evolved to include the "monoblock" effect.5 This term describes a scenario where the canal space is filled with a gap-free, solid mass that consists of the core material, the sealer, and the root canal wall, all bonded into a single, cohesive unit.5 The theoretical advantages of a monoblock are twofold: it simultaneously improves the hermetic seal by eliminating interfacial gaps and enhances the fracture resistance of the root by reinforcing the tooth structure.5 This concept is central to understanding the goals of modern single-cone obturation, particularly when paired with bioactive sealers that can chemically bond to the dentin wall, moving closer to the ideal of a truly integrated and reinforcing root canal filling.14

The Single-Cone Technique: An Evolution in Simplicity

The single-cone obturation (SCO) technique, once relegated to a minor role in endodontics, has undergone a significant resurgence, evolving from a method of last resort to a mainstream, evidence-based approach. This transformation was not driven by a change in the technique's fundamental simplicity but by a paradigm shift in both instrumentation technology and materials science, which together redefined its clinical viability and philosophical underpinnings.

Conceptual Framework: From a Sealer-Minimized to a Sealer-Centric Philosophy

At its core, the single-cone technique is defined by the use of a single, principal gutta-percha cone to fill the root canal, in conjunction with a root canal sealer.7 The technique is typically performed at room temperature, without the application of heat or compaction forces.17 The congruency, or "fit," between the single cone and the prepared canal walls dictates the thickness of the intervening sealer layer.17 This simple definition belies a profound philosophical shift in the approach to obturation. Traditional techniques like cold lateral condensation (CLC) and warm vertical compaction (WVC) are fundamentally "core-centric." Their primary goal is to maximize the volume of the gutta-percha core and minimize the volume of the sealer.17 This philosophy was born from the limitations of early sealers, which were often soluble, prone to shrinkage, and considered the weakest link in the obturation mass. The intricate steps of CLC and WVC—the use of spreaders, pluggers, and heat—are all designed to physically force a greater mass of the stable core material into the prepared space. The modern single-cone technique, especially when paired with advanced bioceramic sealers, represents a complete inversion of this philosophy. It is a "sealer-centric" or "sealer-based" obturation method.19 In this model, the sealer is no longer a passive, weak gap-filler but is instead the primary and active component responsible for creating the three-dimensional seal. The gutta-percha cone's role is transformed from being the bulk of the filling to acting as a master piston or hydraulic plunger.20 Its purpose is to deliver the flowable, dimensionally stable, and often bioactive sealer into the entirety of the root canal system's complex anatomy through hydraulic pressure.20 This conceptual evolution from minimizing the sealer to leveraging its properties is the key to understanding the rationale behind the modern application of SCO.

Historical Trajectory: The Resurgence with NiTi Rotary Systems

The history of the single-cone technique is a clear illustration of the symbiotic relationship between canal instrumentation and obturation methods. The technique's viability has always been directly and causally linked to the capabilities of the shaping technology available at the time. The SCO technique was first introduced in the 1960s, following the standardization of endodontic instrument sizes by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).17 The original concept was logical: after preparing a canal to a specific size, a standardized cone of the same size should, in theory, fit perfectly. The original method involved creating a circular "apical stop" preparation and then selecting a single cone that demonstrated a snug, inlay-like fit with "tug-back" at the working length.17 However, the technique quickly fell out of favor due to a significant practical limitation. Manual instrumentation with stainless steel files, especially in curved or irregularly shaped canals, could not reliably produce the consistently round and uniformly tapered canal shapes required for a single cone to fit accurately.23 The result was often a poor fit, particularly in the middle and coronal thirds of the canal, leading to a reliance on a thick and unpredictable layer of sealer to fill large voids. Given the poor quality of sealers at the time, this made the technique unreliable and prone to leakage.23 The fortunes of the single-cone technique were dramatically reversed by the "NiTi Revolution" of the 1990s and 2000s. The introduction and widespread adoption of Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) rotary instrumentation systems fundamentally changed the nature of canal preparation.7 Unlike manual files, these engine-driven systems could create highly centered, continuously tapered, and remarkably consistent canal shapes, even in severely curved roots.17 This technological leap directly solved the primary problem that had plagued the original single-cone technique. Recognizing this opportunity, manufacturers began to produce gutta-percha cones that were precisely engineered to match the specific tip sizes and tapers of their corresponding rotary file systems.18 This "matched-taper" or "matched-cone" concept is the cornerstone of modern SCO.7 For example, after shaping a canal with a ProTaper F3 finishing file, the clinician can select a ProTaper F3 gutta-percha cone with the confidence that it will closely replicate the geometry of the prepared canal.18 This direct technological pairing between the shaping instrument and the obturation cone provided the predictability and accuracy that was previously unattainable, allowing the single-cone technique to be resurrected as a viable, efficient, and popular obturation method.17 This co-evolution implies that future advancements in SCO will likely be tied to the next generation of shaping files, such as those designed for minimally invasive endodontics.27

Clinical Protocol for Single-Cone Obturation: A Step-by-Step Masterclass

The modern single-cone obturation technique, while conceptually simple, requires a meticulous and systematic clinical protocol to achieve a predictable, three-dimensional seal. Its success is not merely in the placement of a single cone but in the precise execution of each preceding and subsequent step. The procedure can be understood as a process of controlled hydraulics, where the clinician manages the dynamics of a flowable sealer within a confined micro-anatomical space.

Prerequisites: Finalizing Chemo-Mechanical Debridement and Irrigation

Before obturation can be considered, the root canal system must be optimally prepared. This foundational stage is non-negotiable and dictates the ultimate success of the treatment. 1. Complete Instrumentation: The canal must be fully shaped to the predetermined working length using a rotary NiTi file system. This creates the continuous taper that is essential for the matched-taper cone to fit accurately.26 2. Robust Irrigation Protocol: Throughout the instrumentation process, copious irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), typically in concentrations from 3% to 6%, is essential. NaOCl serves as the primary disinfectant and dissolves organic tissue remnants from the canal system. A total volume of at least 25 cc per tooth is often recommended.6 3. Smear Layer Removal: After final shaping, a final rinse with a chelating agent, most commonly 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), is performed for approximately one minute.2 The smear layer is an amorphous layer of organic and inorganic debris created during instrumentation that occludes the dentinal tubules. Its removal is mandatory for two key reasons: it allows for deeper disinfection of the tubules, and it is critical for the proper adaptation and penetration of the sealer, especially for modern bioceramic sealers that rely on interaction with the dentin for bonding and sealing.3 4. Final Rinse: Following EDTA, a final flush with a neutral solution such as sterile water, saline, or an antimicrobial agent like 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) can be used to remove any residual chelator.6 It is imperative that NaOCl and CHX are never used consecutively without an intermediate rinse, as their interaction produces a toxic precipitate (para-chloroaniline) that can stain the tooth and interfere with sealing.6

Master Cone Selection and Verification

The selection and fitting of the master gutta-percha cone is the most critical step in ensuring the mechanical success of the single-cone technique. 1. Matching the Final File: The clinician selects a gutta-percha cone that precisely matches the apical size and taper of the final rotary file used to prepare the canal. For instance, if the canal was finished with a ProTaper Gold F3 file, a corresponding F3 gutta-percha cone is selected.18 Some protocols, particularly those for sealer-centric bioceramic obturations, advocate for selecting a cone that is one size smaller than the master apical file (e.g., a size 35 cone for a size 40 preparation) to ensure adequate space for the sealer to flow, while still binding at the working length.20 2. Working Length Confirmation: The selected cone is measured with a ruler and marked at the established working length using forceps or a similar instrument.26 3. Trial Fit and "Tug-Back": The cone is inserted into the thoroughly dried canal to the full working length. The ideal fit is characterized by a slight frictional resistance to removal, a tactile sensation known as "tug-back".17 This indicates that the apical portion of the cone is snugly adapted to the apical portion of the canal preparation, which is crucial for achieving an effective apical seal. 4. Radiographic Confirmation: With the master cone seated in the canal, a periapical radiograph is taken.26 This is an indispensable step to visually verify that the cone has reached the full working length and appears well-adapted to the prepared canal shape. If the cone is radiographically short of the apex, it may indicate canal blockage or an incorrectly sized cone. If it is long, the working length may be incorrect, or the apical foramen may be overly patent. Based on the radiographic findings, the cone's tip may be trimmed in small increments, or a different size cone may be selected, and the process is repeated until a perfect fit is confirmed.26

Sealer Dynamics: Handling and Precise Placement Techniques

The management of the root canal sealer is where the single-cone technique transitions from a mechanical fitting exercise to a procedure governed by material science and fluid dynamics. 1. Canal Drying: The canal is dried using sterile paper points that match the size and taper of the final preparation.26 The approach to drying depends on the sealer being used. For traditional resin-based sealers, the canal should be thoroughly dried. However, for hydrophilic bioceramic sealers, which require moisture for their hydraulic setting reaction, the canal should not be desiccated.6 The current consensus is evolving, but a common recommendation is to dry the canal until the paper points come out dry at the tip, leaving sufficient residual moisture within the dentinal tubules to initiate the setting reaction without leaving the canal visibly "wet".22 2. Sealer Placement: The sealer is introduced into the canal prior to cone insertion. Several methods can be employed:

• Coating the Walls: A traditional method involves coating the canal walls by spinning a file counter-clockwise or using a paper point to paint the sealer.
• Lentulo Spiral: A Lentulo spiral instrument on a slow-speed handpiece can be used to carry the sealer into the canal. This should be done carefully to avoid whipping air into the sealer and creating voids.17
• Direct Injection: For modern premixed injectable sealers (especially bioceramics), the most recommended method is to use a flexible, narrow-gauge capillary tip attached to the sealer syringe.6 The tip is inserted into the coronal or middle third of the canal, and a small amount of sealer is slowly injected as the tip is withdrawn. This method provides excellent control and minimizes air entrapment.22

3. Coating the Cone: Finally, the apical 3-5 mm of the verified master cone is lightly coated with sealer before it is carried into the canal.17

Hydraulic Condensation: The Slow Insertion and Seating of the Master Cone

This step is the mechanical core of the technique, where the principles of fluid dynamics are leveraged to achieve a three-dimensional fill. 1. Slow and Steady Insertion: The sealer-coated master cone is inserted into the canal with a single, slow, and deliberate movement towards the apex. The recommended insertion time is over a period of 3-5 seconds.6 This slow pace is critical; it allows the viscous sealer to flow apically and laterally, displacing air and filling irregularities without building up excessive pressure that could lead to pain or a large apical extrusion of sealer.22 A gentle pumping motion may be used with some traditional sealers to ensure voids are filled, but a single, smooth motion is generally preferred for modern flowable sealers to avoid creating voids.6 2. Generating Hydraulic Pressure: As the precisely fitted cone advances down the tapered canal, it acts as a piston, generating hydraulic pressure within the sealer.20 This pressure is the driving force that propels the sealer into the entire root canal system, including lateral canals, isthmuses, and fins that the solid cone itself cannot reach. The success of the technique hinges on mastering this controlled hydraulic flow. 3. Troubleshooting Poor Seating: If the master cone fails to reach the full working length after sealer placement, it is typically due to the sealer binding or creating a hydraulic lock. The cone should not be forced. Instead, both the cone and sealer must be removed, the canal re-irrigated and dried, and the sealer placement and cone insertion process repeated.22

Coronal Finishing and Verification

The final steps ensure the quality of the coronal seal and prepare the tooth for its definitive restoration. 1. Searing Excess Gutta-Percha: A heat source, such as a dedicated thermal pen (e.g., Gutta-Cut) or a System B heat plugger, is used to sear off the excess gutta-percha extending into the pulp chamber. The cut should be made at the level of the canal orifice.17 2. Vertical Condensation of the Stump: Immediately after searing, a correctly sized endodontic plugger is used to apply gentle vertical pressure to the softened gutta-percha stump in the orifice.17 This ensures a dense and well-adapted coronal seal, which is critical for preventing coronal microleakage. 3. Cleaning the Access Cavity: The pulp chamber is meticulously cleaned of all residual sealer and gutta-percha. For bioceramic sealers, this can be effectively accomplished with a water spray or a damp cotton pellet, which is a significant clinical advantage over sticky resin sealers.20 4. Final Radiographic Assessment: A final postoperative radiograph is taken to confirm the quality of the obturation. The clinician assesses the density of the fill, its extension to the correct working length, and the presence of any voids or excessive sealer extrusion.20 A small "puff" of sealer at the apex is often considered acceptable and indicative of a complete seal, particularly with biocompatible bioceramic materials.28

The Materials Science Revolution: Bioceramic Sealers and Their Central Role

The resurgence of the single-cone obturation technique from a niche method to a mainstream clinical reality is inextricably linked to a revolution in materials science: the development and refinement of bioceramic root canal sealers. These materials possess a unique combination of physical, chemical, and biological properties that not only compensate for the inherent limitations of a single-cone approach but also transform the sealer from a passive gap-filler into an active, therapeutic agent. Understanding the science of these materials is crucial to appreciating why the modern sealer-centric philosophy of obturation is viable.

Chemical Composition and Setting Reactions

Bioceramic sealers, also known as hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers, are a class of materials primarily composed of fine inorganic particles.3 The core reactive components are typically tricalcium silicate ($3\text{CaO} \cdot \text{SiO}_2$) and dicalcium silicate ($2\text{CaO} \cdot \text{SiO}_2$), which are also the main constituents of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Portland cement.33 To these are added other compounds to optimize clinical properties:

• Radiopacifier: Zirconium oxide ($ZrO_2$) is commonly used to make the sealer visible on radiographs. It is favored over the previously used bismuth oxide, which was found to cause tooth discoloration.33
• Fillers and Thickening Agents: Calcium phosphates (e.g., monobasic calcium phosphate) are often included to enhance bioactivity and handling properties.35
• Calcium Carbonate and Oxide: These may be added to modulate the setting reaction and final properties of the material.34

The defining characteristic of these sealers is their setting mechanism. Unlike traditional resin or zinc oxide-eugenol sealers that set through a chemical polymerization or chelation reaction between a base and a catalyst, bioceramic sealers are hydraulic.19 They set via a hydration reaction, meaning they require water to initiate and complete the process.32 In the clinical context of a root canal, this moisture is readily available from the dentinal tubules.8 The fundamental setting reaction involves the hydration of the calcium silicate particles, which produces two key products: a calcium silicate hydrogel (C-S-H) and calcium hydroxide ($\text{Ca}(\text{OH})_2$).8 The C-S-H gel forms a solid, dimensionally stable matrix that constitutes the bulk of the set sealer, while the liberated calcium hydroxide is the source of the material's profound biological effects.

Key Physicochemical and Biological Properties

The products of the hydration reaction endow bioceramic sealers with a suite of properties that make them uniquely suited for the single-cone technique. These properties fundamentally redefine the role of the sealer from a potential liability into a therapeutic asset.

• Bioactivity: This is arguably the most significant property of bioceramic sealers. The calcium hydroxide released during setting creates a highly alkaline environment. When this comes into contact with phosphate ions present in dentinal fluid and periapical tissues, it leads to the precipitation of hydroxyapatite (HA).8 This newly formed HA is chemically and structurally similar to the mineral component of dentin and bone, allowing the sealer to form a true chemical bond with the root canal wall.8 This process not only creates a superior seal but also actively promotes the healing and regeneration of periapical tissues, an effect not seen with biologically inert resin-based sealers.14
• Hydrophilicity: Because they require water to set, these sealers are hydrophilic. This turns a long-standing clinical challenge—achieving a completely dry canal—into an advantage. Bioceramics use the natural moisture within the root canal system, making them less technique-sensitive to residual dampness that could compromise the setting of hydrophobic resin sealers.14
• Dimensional Stability: A major drawback of many traditional sealers, particularly resin-based ones, is polymerization shrinkage. This shrinkage can create interfacial gaps, leading to microleakage over time.10 In contrast, bioceramic sealers exhibit excellent dimensional stability with negligible shrinkage and may even undergo a slight expansion upon setting.14 This property is critical in a sealer-centric technique like SCO, where the sealer constitutes a significant volume of the final obturation.
• High pH and Antimicrobial Action: The continuous release of hydroxyl ions from the calcium hydroxide byproduct creates a highly alkaline environment, with a pH often rising above 12.15 This high pH is strongly antibacterial, capable of neutralizing residual bacteria on the canal walls and within the dentinal tubules, thus contributing to the disinfection of the root canal system.14
• Excellent Flow and Sealing Ability: Modern bioceramic sealers are formulated to have superior flow characteristics.15 When delivered under the hydraulic pressure of a single cone, this flowability allows the sealer to penetrate deep into dentinal tubules and adapt intimately to complex anatomical features like lateral canals and isthmuses, resulting in a superior seal with less microleakage compared to many traditional materials.34

The Sealer-Dentin Interface: Mineral Infiltration and the Monoblock

The interaction between bioceramic sealers and the root dentin creates a unique and highly integrated interface, bringing the theoretical concept of a "monoblock" closer to a clinical reality. The bonding to dentin is achieved through a dual mechanism: 1. Micromechanical Interlocking: The fine particle size and excellent flow of the sealer allow it to physically penetrate the orifices of the dentinal tubules, creating resin-tag-like structures that provide micromechanical retention upon setting.36 2. Chemical Bonding and Mineral Infiltration: The more profound mechanism is chemical. The high alkalinity of the sealer denatures the collagen in the adjacent intertubular dentin, allowing for the infiltration of mineral ions from the sealer.8 The subsequent reaction between the sealer's calcium ions and the dentin's phosphate ions leads to the formation of hydroxyapatite within this "mineral infiltration zone," effectively creating a chemical bond that fuses the sealer to the dentin wall.8 This intimate, gap-free interface, formed by both chemical and micromechanical means, is a significant advancement over the purely adhesive or frictional interfaces of older systems. It enhances the hermetic seal, reduces the potential for leakage, and may contribute to the structural integrity of the root, fulfilling the goals of the monoblock concept.14

Comparative Analysis of Commercial Bioceramic Sealer Formulations

While sharing a common chemical foundation, commercial bioceramic sealers are not monolithic and exhibit variations in their composition, handling, and performance. They can be broadly categorized based on their chemistry, such as pure tricalcium silicate-based sealers, calcium phosphate silicate-based sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS), and hybrid formulations that incorporate a resin matrix (e.g., MTA Fillapex).36 Laboratory studies have demonstrated performance differences among these products. For instance, one in vitro study found that a calcium phosphate silicate-based sealer exhibited superior dentinal sealing ability compared to both a pure tricalcium silicate-based sealer and a resin-containing bioceramic sealer.40 Clinicians must also consider practical differences in setting time, flow characteristics, radiopacity, and delivery systems (e.g., powder/liquid, paste/paste, or premixed injectable syringes) when selecting a sealer for a specific clinical situation.35 Products like iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, and EndoSequence BC Sealer are popular examples of the premixed, injectable formulations that have greatly simplified the clinical application of these advanced materials.35

A Critical Evaluation: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Performance Metrics

A comprehensive assessment of the single-cone obturation technique requires a balanced evaluation of its well-documented procedural advantages against its inherent limitations and dependencies. The decision to employ SCO in a clinical setting should be based on a thorough understanding of these trade-offs, guided by the specific anatomical and clinical context of the case.

Procedural Efficiencies: Time, Simplicity, and Operator Fatigue

The most universally acknowledged and compelling advantage of the single-cone technique is its remarkable procedural efficiency.

• Speed and Simplicity: Compared to the intricate, multi-step protocols of cold lateral condensation (CLC) and warm vertical compaction (WVC), SCO is significantly faster and simpler to perform.7 The elimination of steps such as spreader or plugger fitting, placement of multiple accessory cones, and complex heating cycles dramatically reduces the chair time required for the obturation phase of treatment.9
• Reduced Fatigue: This streamlined workflow translates directly to less physical and mental fatigue for the clinician and a more comfortable, shorter experience for the patient.7
• Steep Learning Curve: The technique is intuitive and easy to learn, making it an accessible and reliable method for dental students, recent graduates, and general practitioners who may not have extensive experience with more complex obturation techniques.19

Biomechanical Considerations: Minimizing Stress and Risk of Fracture

Beyond efficiency, SCO offers significant biomechanical advantages by minimizing the stresses imparted to the root structure during obturation.

• Passive Technique: SCO is fundamentally a passive, non-compaction technique.9 The gutta-percha cone is seated with gentle pressure, relying on hydraulics rather than physical force to distribute the sealer.
• Reduced Risk of Fracture: This passivity is a key benefit. CLC introduces significant wedging forces via the spreader, which can induce dentinal microcracks and, in susceptible roots, lead to vertical root fracture.21 Similarly, WVC involves both thermal stresses from the heated pluggers and apical compaction forces, which also carry a risk of damaging the root dentin.21 By avoiding these forces, SCO is considered a safer technique that helps preserve the structural integrity of the tooth, a particularly important consideration in roots that have been weakened by extensive preparation.9 One study that directly compared the fracture resistance of teeth obturated with SCO versus WVC (using a bioceramic sealer) found no statistically significant difference, suggesting that modern WVC techniques may also be performed safely, but the inherent risk associated with compaction forces remains a valid concern.43
• Apical Control: The technique provides excellent control of the filling length, as the master cone is pre-fitted to the exact working length. This can reduce the incidence of inadvertent overfilling or underfilling compared to techniques that involve significant apical pressure.9

Inherent Limitations: Sealer Dependency and Complex Morphologies

Despite its numerous advantages, the single-cone technique is not a panacea and has significant limitations that must be respected for its successful application.

• Critical Sealer Dependency: The technique's primary strength—its reliance on a flowable sealer—is also its greatest potential weakness. SCO inherently uses a larger volume of sealer and a smaller volume of solid core material compared to compaction techniques.35 Consequently, the long-term success of the obturation is critically dependent on the physicochemical properties of the sealer used.23 If a sealer with poor dimensional stability (shrinkage) or high solubility is used, the large sealer volume can degrade over time, leading to voids and leakage. This is why the advent of dimensionally stable, low-solubility bioceramic sealers was so crucial to the technique's modern success.
• Inadequacy in Non-Circular Canals: The most significant contraindication for the single-cone technique is the presence of complex root canal morphology. A single, round gutta-percha cone, even one with a matched taper, cannot physically obturate the fins, isthmuses, cul-de-sacs, and buccal or lingual extensions of irregularly shaped canals (e.g., oval, ribbon-shaped, C-shaped).18 In these anatomies, the SCO technique will inevitably leave large, sealer-filled voids in the areas of irregularity.18 While a high-quality bioceramic sealer may perform well in these voids, the lack of a solid core backing makes these areas potential points of weakness in the long-term seal.
• Potential for Voids: Even in relatively round canals, the technique is susceptible to the formation of voids or porosities within the sealer mass itself, particularly in the middle and coronal thirds of the canal.18 These can result from air entrapment during sealer placement or inadequate hydraulic flow.

Table 1: A Multi-Parametric Comparison of Endodontic Obturation Techniques

To facilitate clinical decision-making, the following table synthesizes the evidence comparing the key characteristics of Single-Cone Obturation (specifically with bioceramic sealers), Cold Lateral Condensation, and Warm Vertical Compaction.

Parameter Single-Cone Obturation (with Bioceramics) Cold Lateral Condensation (CLC) Warm Vertical Compaction (WVC) Procedural Simplicity & Learning Curve High simplicity, easy to learn 22 Moderate simplicity, requires practice with spreader placement 48 Low simplicity, complex technique with a significant learning curve 21 Time Efficiency High (fastest technique) 7 Low (time-consuming due to multiple cone placements) 9 Low (most time-consuming technique) 29 Apical Sealing Ability Good to excellent; evidence is variable but generally comparable to or better than CLC, especially with bioceramics 24 Good; considered the historical gold standard, but can leave spreader tracts 12 Excellent; generally considered to provide a superior apical seal due to thermoplastic adaptation 24 Adaptation to Canal Irregularities Poor; ineffective in oval, flattened, or C-shaped canals 18 Moderate; can fill some irregularities but is limited by spreader penetration 9 Excellent; superior ability to flow thermoplasticized GP into isthmuses and lateral canals 24 Risk of Material Extrusion Low to moderate; dependent on apical foramen size and insertion speed 9 Low; good apical control of master cone 48 High; risk of apical extrusion of both sealer and softened gutta-percha 9 Risk of Vertical Root Fracture Very Low; passive, non-compaction technique 9 Moderate; wedging forces from spreaders can induce cracks 21 Moderate; thermal and vertical compaction forces can induce stress 21 Reliance on Sealer Properties Very High; success is critically dependent on sealer's dimensional stability and low solubility 23 Moderate; aims to minimize sealer volume but still relies on it to fill gaps 17 Low; aims to maximize GP volume and minimize sealer, making it less dependent on sealer properties 19 Material & Equipment Cost Low to moderate; requires no special equipment beyond standard instruments, but bioceramic sealers can be expensive 26 Low; requires only basic instruments (spreaders) and materials 48 High; requires specialized heat sources, pluggers, and often an injection gun 21 Retreatability Moderate to difficult; dependent on sealer. Bioceramic sealers can be difficult to remove 3 Moderate; multiple GP points can be straightforward to remove with solvents and files 13 Difficult; a dense, homogenous mass of GP can be challenging to penetrate and remove 13

Evidence-Based Comparison with Conventional Techniques

The evaluation of any endodontic obturation technique must be grounded in scientific evidence. In vitro laboratory studies, while not perfectly replicating the clinical environment, provide invaluable data on the physical performance of different methods. Techniques such as micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), microleakage analysis, and fracture resistance testing offer quantitative comparisons of how well single-cone obturation performs against the established benchmarks of cold lateral condensation and warm vertical compaction.

Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) Findings: A Volumetric Analysis

Micro-computed tomography has emerged as the state-of-the-art modality for the three-dimensional, non-destructive evaluation of root canal obturations.52 It allows for the precise volumetric quantification of the three key components of the fill: the gutta-percha core, the sealer, and any remaining voids or gaps.54 A consistent and crucial finding across numerous micro-CT studies is that no currently available obturation technique can produce a completely void-free root canal filling.50 However, distinct patterns emerge when comparing techniques. Thermoplastic methods, such as warm vertical compaction and carrier-based systems, generally result in a denser obturation with fewer voids and a higher percentage of gutta-percha-filled area (PGFA) compared to cold techniques.24 When SCO is compared, its performance is highly dependent on the canal anatomy being tested. In straight, relatively circular canals, the quality of obturation with SCO can be comparable to other techniques.24 However, in more challenging, clinically realistic anatomies such as flattened or oval canals, SCO tends to produce a higher percentage of sealer-filled area (PSFA) and a greater volume of voids, particularly in the middle and coronal thirds.35 One study specifically examining flattened canals found that a thermoplastic technique created a smaller percentage of voids in the cervical and middle thirds compared to SCO, although there was no significant difference in the critical apical third.44 This volumetric evidence supports the theoretical limitation of SCO: a single round cone cannot physically adapt to non-circular cross-sections, leaving the sealer to fill the remaining space.

Apical and Coronal Microleakage Studies

Microleakage studies aim to assess the sealing ability of an obturation by measuring the penetration of a tracer, such as dye, fluid, or bacteria, along the interface of the filling material and the canal wall. The evidence from these studies regarding the relative performance of SCO is notably inconsistent and often contradictory. Several studies have reported that SCO results in significantly more apical or coronal leakage than CLC or WVC, suggesting an inferior seal.18 This finding is often attributed to the larger volume of sealer, which may be more prone to dissolution or leakage than a dense gutta-percha core.45 Conversely, a substantial body of research has found that the sealing ability of SCO is comparable to, or not statistically different from, both CLC and various thermoplastic techniques.7 A few studies have even found SCO to provide a superior seal to CLC, particularly when specific modern sealers are used.18 One compelling study utilizing a bioceramic sealer (iRoot SP) found that the SCO group exhibited the smallest amount of apical dye penetration when compared to WVC groups using either the same bioceramic sealer or a traditional resin sealer (AH Plus).35 This variability in the literature highlights that the sealing ability is likely influenced as much by the type of sealer used and the quality of the canal preparation as by the obturation technique itself.

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth

A critical long-term consideration in endodontics is the preservation of the tooth's structural integrity. The forces applied during the obturation procedure can introduce stresses and microcracks in the root dentin, potentially increasing the risk of subsequent vertical root fracture. Both CLC and WVC are active compaction techniques that generate stress within the root. The wedging forces created by the insertion of a spreader during CLC and the combination of thermal and vertical forces from heated pluggers during WVC are well-documented sources of dentinal stress.9 In contrast, SCO is considered a passive, low-stress technique. Because it does not involve any compaction forces, it is biomechanically less likely to cause iatrogenic damage to the root structure.9 Direct comparative studies on fracture resistance have yielded interesting results. One in vitro study compared the force required to fracture mandibular incisors obturated with either SCO or WVC, with both groups using a bioceramic sealer. The study found no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance between the two techniques.43 This suggests that while WVC does introduce compaction forces, they may not be sufficient to significantly weaken the root compared to a passive SCO technique, at least under the conditions of that study. Nonetheless, the inherent absence of compaction forces in SCO remains a compelling theoretical advantage for preserving tooth structure. The collective in vitro evidence presents a nuanced picture. Volumetric analyses from micro-CT studies often favor warm compaction techniques, which produce a denser fill with fewer voids, especially in complex anatomies. However, this apparent physical superiority does not consistently translate to superior performance in microleakage studies, nor does it necessarily result in a stronger tooth. This disconnect between the physical perfection of the fill measured in the laboratory and its functional performance suggests that other factors may be at play. This discrepancy becomes even more pronounced when examining the results of long-term clinical outcome studies, which often show little to no difference in success rates between techniques. This suggests that while a dense, well-adapted fill is the goal, the biological properties of the materials used and the quality of the preceding disinfection may be more powerful determinants of in vivo success than minor volumetric differences in the obturation itself.

Clinical Outcomes and Long-Term Success

While in vitro studies provide valuable mechanistic insights, the ultimate measure of any dental technique's worth is its performance in clinical practice over the long term. The evaluation of clinical success, typically defined by the absence of signs and symptoms and the radiographic healing of periapical lesions, requires evidence from well-controlled clinical trials, retrospective studies, and, most powerfully, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. When the single-cone technique is subjected to this level of scrutiny, the evidence suggests it is a reliable and effective method, with outcomes that are largely comparable to traditional techniques.

Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

The highest level of clinical evidence is derived from systematic reviews that aggregate the results of multiple individual studies. A consistent and overarching conclusion from several such reviews is that there is no statistically significant difference in the clinical and radiographic success rates of primary non-surgical endodontic treatment when comparing different obturation techniques, including single-cone, cold lateral condensation, and warm vertical compaction.41 These reviews highlight a more critical determinant of treatment outcome: the preoperative status of the tooth. The presence of a periapical lesion before treatment is consistently shown to be the most substantial prognostic factor for endodontic failure, with odds ratios for failure being significantly higher in these cases, regardless of the obturation technique employed.16 Other factors, such as the quality of the final coronal restoration and the technical quality of the obturation (i.e., adequate length and absence of gross voids), also play a more significant role than the specific method used to place the filling material.16 This body of evidence supports a "good enough" principle in obturation: once a certain threshold of quality is achieved—namely, a well-disinfected canal sealed to the proper working length without major defects—the specific technique used to achieve that seal has a diminishing impact on the final clinical outcome. The choice between techniques may therefore be justifiably based on secondary factors like procedural efficiency, cost, operator experience, and, crucially, the specific anatomy of the canal being treated.

Performance of SCO with Bioceramic Sealers vs. Traditional Sealers

The synergy between the SCO technique and bioceramic sealers has been a focus of recent clinical research. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly compared the outcomes of SCO with a bioceramic sealer against conventional obturation techniques (such as CLC or WVC with traditional resin-based sealers).14 The results were illuminating:

• At the 6-month and 12-month follow-up points, the success rate for the bioceramic group was consistently higher than for the control group (88.7% and 87.1% for bioceramics vs. 76.4% for controls at both time points).
• By the 18-month follow-up, the success rates were nearly equivalent, at 92.0% for the bioceramic group and 90.7% for the control group.

While a clear trend favoring the bioceramic/SCO combination was observed, particularly in the earlier stages of healing, the overall differences between the groups were not statistically significant ($p > 0.05$).15 The authors of the meta-analysis concluded that single-cone obturation with bioceramic sealers may offer small but clinically relevant advantages, while emphasizing the need for more high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up periods to confirm these findings.15 Retrospective clinical studies provide further long-term data. One study with a mean follow-up period of 6.3 years investigated outcomes for teeth treated with three different methods, two of which were single-cone techniques with different sealers. The study found an overall success rate of 75.4% and, importantly, reported no significant correlation between the type of obturation technique used and the treatment outcome.16 Another recent retrospective study came to a similar conclusion, finding no significant differences in treatment success between various sealers and filling techniques, including SCO with a bioceramic sealer.21

Postoperative Pain and Healing

Beyond success and failure rates, patient-centered outcomes like postoperative pain are an important consideration. The biological properties of bioceramic sealers may offer an advantage in this regard. Some clinical evidence suggests that the use of bioceramic sealers is associated with a lower incidence and intensity of postoperative pain compared to traditional epoxy resin-based sealers.31 A systematic review found a small, though not statistically significant, trend toward lower pain within the first 24 hours when bioceramics were used.38 In terms of healing, the bioactive nature of bioceramic sealers is hypothesized to promote a more rapid and complete resolution of periapical lesions.60 One clinical study on retreatment cases found a 100% success rate for teeth obturated with a calcium silicate-based sealer compared to 93.75% for those obturated with an epoxy resin-based sealer, with the authors noting a faster healing capacity for the bioceramic material.61 While promising, these findings require further validation through large-scale, long-term prospective trials.

Clinical Application: Case Selection Criteria

The cumulative evidence from in vitro and clinical studies makes it clear that the single-cone obturation technique is not a universal solution but rather a highly effective tool when applied in the appropriate clinical context. Its success is not inherent to the technique itself but is highly dependent on the anatomical characteristics of the root canal being treated. Therefore, the most critical skill for a clinician choosing to use SCO is not merely the execution of the procedure, but the diagnostic acumen to select the right case. This act of case selection, performed before the obturation begins, is arguably the single most important determinant of success.

Indications for the Single-Cone Technique

The SCO technique is indicated and often advantageous in cases with specific morphological and clinical characteristics:

• Round, Continuously Tapered Canals: The ideal indication for SCO is a root canal that has been instrumented to a relatively circular cross-section with a continuous taper from orifice to apex.10 In such cases, a matched-taper gutta-percha cone can achieve an intimate fit, minimizing the sealer layer and maximizing the predictability of the fill. This anatomy is common in anterior teeth and the palatal roots of maxillary molars or distal roots of mandibular molars.
• Narrow, Long, and Curved Canals: SCO, particularly when paired with a flowable bioceramic sealer, offers a distinct advantage in anatomically challenging canals that are long, narrow, or possess significant curvature.18 In these situations, the safe and effective penetration of heat carriers or pluggers for warm vertical compaction to within 4-5 mm of the working length can be difficult or impossible without excessive and potentially dangerous canal enlargement. SCO allows for a more conservative preparation while still enabling a three-dimensional seal via the hydraulic flow of the sealer.22
• Posterior Teeth and Limited Access: The procedural simplicity and speed of SCO make it an excellent choice for multi-rooted posterior teeth, where access can be difficult and patient and operator fatigue are concerns.9 It is also highly suitable for patients with restricted mouth opening, where the time-consuming and instrument-intensive nature of other techniques would be problematic.27

Contraindications and Areas for Caution

The limitations of the technique define its contraindications, and failure to respect these will likely lead to a compromised obturation.

• Ovoid, Flattened, or Irregularly Shaped Canals: This is the most significant and absolute contraindication for the standard single-cone technique.18 Root canals with a cross-section that is oval, ribbon-shaped, C-shaped, or possessed of significant fins and isthmuses cannot be adequately filled by a single round cone.22 This anatomical mismatch will inevitably result in large, sealer-filled voids that lack a solid core backing, compromising the integrity and longevity of the seal.45 In these common anatomical variations (e.g., mandibular incisors, maxillary premolars, mesial roots of mandibular molars), a thermoplastic technique like WVC, which can flow softened gutta-percha into these irregularities, is strongly indicated.22 Alternatively, a modified "hybrid" technique, where accessory cones are used to supplement the master cone, may be employed.26
• Internal Resorption Defects: The complex and irregular morphology of internal resorption defects is generally better managed with a thermoplastic obturation technique that can three-dimensionally adapt to the resorptive cavity.22
• Immature Teeth with Open Apices: Cases with wide, non-constricted apical foramina are not suitable for conventional gutta-percha techniques. These require specialized apexification procedures, typically involving the placement of an apical plug with a bioceramic material like MTA before backfilling the remainder of the canal.5

The Role of Advanced Imaging (CBCT) in Treatment Planning

The ability to accurately diagnose root canal morphology is paramount to proper case selection for SCO. While traditional two-dimensional periapical radiographs are essential, they provide no information about the cross-sectional shape of the canal. This is where cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an invaluable diagnostic tool in modern endodontics.62 A preoperative CBCT scan can reveal the true three-dimensional anatomy of the root canal system, clearly identifying ovoid, C-shaped, or other non-circular morphologies that would be completely invisible on a 2D film.62 By providing this crucial information during the treatment planning phase, CBCT empowers the clinician to make an informed, evidence-based decision regarding the most appropriate obturation technique. It allows the practitioner to proactively choose a method like WVC for a challenging oval canal, rather than discovering the anatomical mismatch after attempting and failing to achieve a satisfactory seal with a single-cone approach. In this way, advanced imaging elevates case selection from a matter of estimation to one of precision, directly enhancing the probability of a successful outcome.

The Future Trajectory: Innovations in Single-Cone Obturation

The evolution of the single-cone obturation technique is far from over. Driven by continuous advancements in materials science, instrumentation, and digital technology, the future of SCO is poised to become even more integrated, predictable, and biologically focused. The trajectory of innovation suggests a move away from thinking of SCO as a standalone "technique" and toward viewing it as a key component of a complete, digitally-driven endodontic treatment "system."

Advancements in Instrumentation

The co-evolution of shaping files and obturation cones continues to drive progress. The current trend toward minimally invasive endodontics, which aims to preserve as much pericervical and radicular dentin as possible to enhance the long-term structural integrity of the tooth, is creating a new demand for instrumentation. New, highly flexible file systems with more conservative designs are being developed and paired with the SCO technique to achieve adequate disinfection with minimal tooth structure removal.27 Beyond shaping, innovation is also focused on the critical step of sealer delivery. Recognizing that void formation is a primary weakness of the technique, researchers are developing novel delivery systems to optimize the hydraulic placement of the sealer. One such innovation is a modified, passive-deflation sealer injection needle. This device is designed with vents to allow trapped air in the apical portion of the canal to escape as the sealer is injected, mitigating the "vapor lock" effect that can lead to the formation of persistent air bubbles and voids in the final obturation.47 Such instruments aim to make the hydraulic component of SCO more reliable and less technique-sensitive.

Next-Generation Materials: Bioactive and Regenerative Sealers

The materials science revolution that propelled modern SCO is ongoing. The future of root canal sealers lies in enhancing their biological functionality beyond what is offered by current bioceramics.

• Nano-Enhanced Formulations: The integration of nanotechnology is a key area of research. The development of bioactive nanoparticles and modified bioceramic compositions aims to further improve the material's physical properties, such as flow, adaptability, and resistance to degradation, while enhancing its biological effects.33
• Multifunctional and Regenerative Sealers: The ultimate goal is to create "smart" sealers that are not just biocompatible but actively regenerative. Future materials will likely possess multifunctional properties, including sustained, long-term antimicrobial effects (e.g., through the release of silver nanoparticles or other agents), and the ability to actively promote the regeneration of periapical tissues, including cementum and periodontal ligament.33 This represents the next logical step in the paradigm shift from mechanically filling a space to biologically healing a wound.

Integration of Digital Workflow and Artificial Intelligence

The continued integration of digital technology will further standardize and improve the outcomes of the single-cone technique.

• Digitally-Guided Planning: The use of CBCT for preoperative assessment will become standard practice. This will be augmented by artificial intelligence (AI) software that can automatically analyze 3D imaging data, segment the root canal system, and provide quantitative metrics on its shape and complexity. Such systems could recommend the optimal obturation technique—for example, confirming that a canal's circularity is suitable for SCO or flagging an ovoid canal that requires a thermoplastic approach.63
• Guided Endodontics: The principles of guided surgery are being adapted for endodontics. This involves using CBCT data to design and 3D-print a custom stent that guides the clinician's instruments. While currently focused on access and negotiation of calcified canals, this technology could be expanded to guide the entire preparation and even the obturation process. A guided system could ensure that the preparation perfectly matches the intended cone dimensions and that the cone is inserted along the ideal path, further increasing the predictability and success of the single-cone system.

This convergence of minimally invasive instrumentation, advanced bioactive materials, intelligent delivery systems, and digital planning points toward a future where single-cone obturation is a highly refined, system-based approach that maximizes both procedural efficiency and biological healing.

Conclusion

The single-cone obturation technique represents a compelling example of cyclical evolution in endodontics, a method once dismissed for its limitations that has been revitalized and validated through parallel advancements in canal instrumentation and materials science. Its modern application, predicated on the synergy between precisely machined NiTi rotary files and their matched-taper gutta-percha cones, offers undeniable advantages in terms of procedural simplicity, time efficiency, and biomechanical safety by minimizing stress on the root structure. The true enabler of this resurgence, however, has been the development of bioceramic sealers. These materials have fundamentally shifted the obturation paradigm from a core-centric to a sealer-centric philosophy. By possessing properties of bioactivity, hydrophilicity, dimensional stability, and antimicrobial action, the sealer is transformed from a passive weak link into an active therapeutic agent that promotes periapical healing and chemically bonds to the tooth. This has allowed the single-cone technique, which relies heavily on the quality of its sealer, to achieve clinical success rates that are comparable to those of more complex, time-consuming, and technically demanding methods like cold lateral condensation and warm vertical compaction. Despite its strengths, the single-cone technique is not a universal solution. Its primary and most significant limitation is its ineffectiveness in obturating root canals with irregular, non-circular cross-sections. The evidence strongly indicates that in such cases, thermoplastic techniques remain superior in their ability to achieve a dense, three-dimensional fill. Consequently, the most critical determinant of success with the single-cone technique is meticulous case selection, a process that is greatly enhanced by the use of advanced diagnostic imaging like CBCT. In conclusion, single-cone obturation with a bioceramic sealer is a valid, evidence-based, and highly efficient method for filling the root canal system. When applied to the appropriate canal morphology—namely, well-tapered, relatively round canals, or in long, curved canals where other techniques are impractical—it offers predictable and successful long-term outcomes. The choice of obturation technique should not be a matter of dogmatic preference but a clinical decision based on a careful assessment of root canal anatomy, operator experience, and a deep understanding of the materials being used. In this context, the single-cone technique has earned its place as an indispensable tool in the modern endodontic armamentarium. Nguồn trích dẫn 1. Patient Symptoms (T O E) | PDF | Mouth | Dentistry Branches – Scribd, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/516674819/OBTURASI 2. (PDF) Non-surgical endodontics – obturation – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390717955_Non-surgical_endodontics_-_obturation 3. Endodontic Sealers and Innovations to Enhance Their Properties: A …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/18/18/4259 4. Non-surgical endodontics – obturation – PMC – NIH, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11991912/ 5. obturation techniques in endodontics.pptx – Slideshare, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/obturation-techniques-in-endodontics-pptx/275590526 6. Simplifying endodontics: a single cone obturation technique using EndoREZ, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://endopracticeus.com/simplifying-endodontics-a-single-cone-obturation-technique-using-endorez/ 7. Advantages and disadvantages of the single cone technique, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=67745 8. Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review – PMC, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4868912/ 9. Most Common Obturation Technique Used Between Anterior and Posterior Teeth, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.jrmds.in/articles/most-common-obturation-technique-used-between-anterior-and-posterior-teeth-92343.html 10. Endodontic Materials Used To Fill Root Canals – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587367/ 11. Obturation technique | PPTX – Slideshare, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/obturation-technique/158356217 12. Comparison of efficacy of different obturation techniques – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390524878_Comparison_of_efficacy_of_different_obturation_techniques 13. Obturation – Pocket Dentistry, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pocketdentistry.com/obturation/ 14. Clinical and radiographic success of single-cone bioceramic obturation versus traditional techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – PMC, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12424407/ 15. Clinical and radiographic success of single-cone bioceramic obturation versus traditional techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395325565_Clinical_and_radiographic_success_of_single-cone_bioceramic_obturation_versus_traditional_techniques_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_of_randomized_controlled_trials 16. Endodontic Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using Different Obturation Techniques: A Clinical Study – NIH, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10453118/ 17. (PDF) Introduction of a novel obturation method: The single-matched …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263543730_Introduction_of_a_novel_obturation_method_The_single-matched_taper-sized_gutta-percha_cone_technique 18. Single-cone obturation technique: A literature review – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313598806_Single-cone_obturation_technique_A_literature_review 19. Advanced Materials for Clinical Endodontic Applications: Current …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/15/2/31 20. NeoSEALER™ Flo for improved obturation – Endodontic Practice US, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://endopracticeus.com/single-cone-endodontic-obturation-with-neosealer-flo/ 21. (PDF) Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383022619_Clinical_outcome_of_non-surgical_root_canal_treatment_using_different_sealers_and_techniques_of_obturation_in_237_patients_A_retrospective_study 22. Single Cone Obturation: Mastering The Technique with Bioceramic …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://endodontics.styleitaliano.org/single-cone-obturation-mastering-the-technique-with-bioceramic-sealers/ 23. Methods of obturation: Review – ScienceScholar, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijhs/article/download/5543/1565 24. Single-cone obturation technique: a literature review – Rev@Odonto, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-56852012000400015 25. In Vitro Evaluation of Matched-Taper Single-Cone Obturation with a Fluid Filtration Method – Canadian Dental Association, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.cda-adc.ca/jcda/vol-75/issue-2/123.pdf 26. Single Cone Endodontic Technique | Coconote, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://coconote.app/notes/375d351e-91fc-491d-a468-8d3397381707 27. Application of Minimally Invasive Instrument Combined with Single-cone Obturation in Root Canal Treatment of Patients with Restricted Mouth Opening, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, http://manu45.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_kqyxyj/EN/10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.01.011 28. Step-by-step procedure to simplified and efficient root canal …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.perioimplantadvisory.com/restorative-dentistry/article/16411537/step-by-step-procedure-to-simplified-and-efficient-root-canal-techniques 29. Hydraulic (Single Cone) Versus Thermogenic (Warm Vertical Compaction) Obturation Techniques: A Systematic Review – PMC – NIH, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11193544/ 30. Single Cone Obturation | Basics of Endodontics – YouTube, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rxReN2b48k 31. Obturation protocol for general practice | Septodont UK, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.septodont.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2024/03/Obturation-protocol-for-General-Practice-Dr-Sascha-Herbst.pdf?x84487 32. Bioceramics in endodontics – a review – PMC, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750835/ 33. Endodontic Bioceramic Sealers – Evolution and Future Directions – Acta Scientific, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/ASMS-09-2021.pdf 34. Bioceramics in endodontics – A review – IP Indian J Conserv Endod, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://ijce.in/archive/volume/7/issue/4/article/3701 35. Sealing ability of the single-cone obturation technique with bioceramic sealer iRoot SP in oval root canals: an in vitro study – PMC – NIH, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12374461/ 36. (PDF) Bioceramic Sealers: The New Way To Deal With The Seal – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384291260_Bioceramic_Sealers_The_New_Way_To_Deal_With_The_Seal 37. ijce.in, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://ijce.in/archive/volume/7/issue/4/article/3701#:~:text=Bioceramic%20sealers&text=Secondly%2C%20bioceramic%20materials%20contain%20calcium,%2Dto%2Droot%20dentin%20bonding. 38. The efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers versus standard sealers on root canal treatment outcome, extrusion rate and post – Tehran University of Medical Sciences, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://en.tums.ac.ir/file/download/board/66e56d3d6f29e-int-endodontic-j-2024-zamparini-the-efficacy-of-premixed-bioceramic-sealers-versus-standard-sealers-on-root-canal.pdf 39. Evaluating the Efficacy of Bioceramic versus Resin-Based Sealers in Endodontic Treatments: A Comparative Analysis – PMC – NIH, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12244888/ 40. (PDF) COMPARISON OF THREE BIOCERAMIC SEALERS IN TERMS OF DENTINAL SEALING ABILITY IN THE ROOT CANAL – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343217670_COMPARISON_OF_THREE_BIOCERAMIC_SEALERS_IN_TERMS_OF_DENTINAL_SEALING_ABILITY_IN_THE_ROOT_CANAL 41. Influence of the root canal filling technique on the success rate of primary endodontic treatments: a systematic review, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://rde.ac/journal/view.php?doi=10.5395/rde.2022.47.e40 42. Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers – NIH, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873427/ 43. Comparison of Fracture Resistance between Single-cone and Warm Vertical Compaction Technique Using Bio-C Sealer® in Mandibular Incisors: An In Vitro Study, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.thejcdp.com/doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3311 44. Effect of obturation technique using a new bioceramic sealer on the presence of voids in flattened root canals – SciELO, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.scielo.br/j/bor/a/qzXNv494RWmRyXFnqLdCVjr/ 45. Sealing properties of two contemporary single-cone obturation systems – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6479357_Sealing_properties_of_two_contemporary_single-cone_obturation_systems 46. Comparison of a Warm Gutta-Percha Obturation Technique and Lateral Condensation, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11639452_Comparison_of_a_Warm_Gutta-Percha_Obturation_Technique_and_Lateral_Condensation 47. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation on the quality of single-cone obturation using a modified passive-deflation sealer injection needle: an in vitro study, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031986/ 48. Influence of the root canal filling technique on the success rate of primary endodontic treatments: a systematic review, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://rde.ac/journal/view.php?number=1039 49. Superiority of Warm Vertical Condensation in C-shaped root canals: improved periodontal health, enhanced fracture resistance, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://e-century.us/files/ajtr/17/3/ajtr0161846.pdf 50. Complete Obturation—Cold Lateral Condensation vs. Thermoplastic Techniques: A Systematic Review of Micro-CT Studies – MDPI, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/14/4013 51. Single-cone obturation technique: a literature review – Univille, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.univille.edu.br/community/depto_odontologia/VirtualDisk.html/downloadFile/433439/v9n4a13.pdf 52. Micro-Computed Tomography Assessment of the Quality of Obturation (Voids) of Single-Canal Maxillary Second Premolars by – Journal of Dentistry, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/article_49954_91835c91be34b08cc7bdac3b58d3ab91.pdf 53. Differences of Micro-CT evaluation of the obturation sealing capability between thermoplastic carrier-based condensing techniques and lateral heat condensation techniques – ResearchGate, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362691696_Differences_of_Micro-CT_evaluation_of_the_obturation_sealing_capability_between_thermoplastic_carrier-based_condensing_techniques_and_lateral_heat_condensation_techniques 54. [PDF] Differences of Micro-CT evaluation of the obturation sealing capability between thermoplastic carrier-based condensing techniques and lateral heat condensation techniques | Semantic Scholar, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/445815fe13434fe75e2b6ac51857f4118b948beb 55. An in-vitro comparative micro-computed tomographic evaluation of three obturation systems, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-85162018000400010 56. Comparison of the single cone and cold lateral compaction …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46191246_Comparison_of_the_single_cone_and_cold_lateral_compaction_techniques_in_sealing_004_taper_root_canal_preparations 57. Post-treatment radiographic and clinical evaluation of matched-taper single-cone versus warm vertical compaction technique: a one-year follow up study – MedCrave online, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://medcraveonline.com/JDHODT/post-treatment-radiographic-and-clinical-evaluation-of-matched-taper-single-cone-versus-warm-verticalcompaction-technique-a-one-year-follow-up-study.html 58. Clinical and Radiographic Failure of Non-surgical Endodontic …, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7ab02c4c0eb777c7b48e2ef2ceea6ff9207f6d3 59. Clinical and radiographic success of single-cone bioceramic obturation versus traditional techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials – PubMed, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40948576/ 60. Comparative Efficacy of Bioceramic and Traditional Sealers in Root Canal Therapy: A Clinical Outcome Analysis, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.ijlbpr.com/uploadfiles/22vol14issue1pp117-121.20250111092023.pdf 61. Clinical outcome of root canal obturation using different based sealers: a retrospective cohort study – Odontologos.com, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://odontologos.com.co/assets/doc/news/2024-12-27_131247s12903-024-05380-6.pdf 62. Single-Visit Endodontic Management of a Complex Endo-Periodontal Lesion in an Oncologic Patient with Systemic Comorbidities: A 12-Month Case Report – PMC – PubMed Central, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12468082/ 63. Advances in Root Canal Obturation: Integration of … – Frontiers, truy cập vào tháng 10 27, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/71628/advances-in-root-canal-obturation-integration-of-innovative-filling-materials-and-contemporary-techniques